All of these payments, the whole
of this system was based on the parish looking after its own. And only its
own and not those of other parishes and vice versa. It was clearly crucial therefores to establish who did belong to the parish and where people were
legally settled.

You might think that this would be straightforward enough and many
suppose that places like Stogumber were very insular and isolated places
in the past with most people spending their whole life in the parish, but
this was not necessarily the case. And the devil with this apparently
straightforward requirement lay in the detail as so often is the case.
For instance if you were born in the parish, did that give you legal
settlement ? What if your parents were born in another parish and were
only here for a brief period, what then ? Or if one parent was born in the
parish and another elsewhere ? If they moved, or one or both died, then what
? It’s perhaps easier to understand these problems if we substitute the
word UK for parish – so being born in the UK is not enough on its own to
make you a UK citizen.
Faced with these problems of interpretation laws relating to settlement
changed and became firmer over time but basically one of three
requirements had to be met to be legally settled in a parish. The
underlying principle was that people took their legal settlement from that
of their parents at the time of their birth; or they could gain a legal
settlement by renting property in the parish over a certain value; or by
having a contract to work in the parish for a period of a year or more.
All of these payments, the whole of this system was based on the parish
looking after its own. And only its own and not those of other parishes
and vice versa. Clearly crucial to all of this to establish who did belong
to the parish and where people were legally settled
You might think that this would be straightforward enough and many
suppose that places like Stogumber were very insular and isolated places
in the past with most people spending their whole life in the parish but
this was not necessarily the case. And the devil with this apparently
straightforward requirement lay in the detail as so often is the case.
For instance if you were born in the parish did that give you legal
settlement ? What if your parents were born in another parish and were
only here for a brief period what then ? Or if one parent was born in the
parish and another elsewhere ? If they moved or one or both died then what
? It’s perhaps easier to understand these problems if we substitute the
word UK for parish – so being born in the UK is not enough on its own to
make you a UK citizen.
Faced with these problems of interpretation laws relating to settlement
changed and became firmer over time but basically one of three
requirements had to be met to be legally settled in a parish: the
underlying principle was that people took their legal settlement from that
of their parents at the time of their birth; or they could gain a legal
settlement by renting property in the parish over a certain value; or by
having a contract to work in the parish for a period of a year or more.
They therefore did not necessarily have to LIVE in a parish to be
legally settled there. And so what on the face of it seems a very simple
idea – that the parish look after its own - produced some unexpected and
sometimes bizarre outcomes
Consider for example James Hayes, a man who was born and lived all his
life in Milverton but at age of 24 became too ill to work or even to leave
his bed and consequently claimed relief from the parish of Milverton.
Milverton however sent the bill to Stogumber as although James had lived
all his life in Milverton, and his parents both lived there and had done
so since he was born, they were nevertheless legally settled in Stogumber.
And so the remit of Stogumber’s overseers could pass well beyond the
parish. For instance in 1768 they paid for a nurse to attend William Longs
family who had smallpox but who all lived at Bristol.
When there was a dispute or uncertainty about where somebody was
legally settled then either they or the overseers had the right of appeal
to the magistrates – examined and statements taken such as these here
The evidence of James Bellamy labourer residing at Bristol 1767
The place of my last legal settlement was and still is Stogumber which
I gained by reason of being a covenanted servant of George Bickham a
farmer of the parish for two years. I have not since leaving the service
of George Bickham gained any other place of settlement.
This information sworn before an officer of the corporation of Bristol
and was read over to James Bellamy being blind. And further he did guide
James Bellamys hand to sign the said evidence.
The evidence of Ann Simmons residing at Berkely Place Bristol 1838
I married my husband John Simmons at Sampford Brett on 12th
December 1833 by whom I have one child, Mary Ann aged 2 years and
upwards. I have heard and believe that the last legal place of settlement
of my husband was in the parish of Stogumber by his hiring and service to
Mr Allen of that parish for the space of 12 months and upwards which
service he left 8 or 9 years ago and has not to my knowledge or
remembrance .been in any place of service for twelve months since or
rented any tenement of the value of £10 a year or done any other act to
gain a subsequent settlement. And I have further heard and believe that
the last legal settlement of Thomas Simmons the father of my husband is
also in the parish of Stogumber and that he is an inmate in the poor
house. I am now about four months pregnant and my husband left and
deserted me about 3 months since and he has not since returned or
contributed anything to my support and in consequence myself and my child
have become chargeable to the parish of St Augustine in Bristol